Realizationism Art Blog

Realizationism Art Blog
Click my Art Blogs

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

After its Kind, an evolutionist detour


Genesis 1:21-25
King James Version (KJV)
 21And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
 22And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth.
 23And the evening and the morning were the fifth day.
 24And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so.
 25And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.


Evolution, states that all life forms are constantly CHANGING and "EVOLVING" into different, "more advanced" life forms, and that therefore there really is no such thing as a set "SPECIES", since all life forms are related, having evolved from the same basic ancestor, and are even now still in a constant state of change!
Do you buy that Theory? It was even taught in school curriculum.
Evolution is now referred to in most textbooks as "the Great Principle" of biology. But according to the dictionary, a "PRINCIPLE" means a "foundation TRUTH", a "FACT". 
However from the verses I cited above tell a different story. The Bible, seems to be teaching us a different science. It states, all of today's plant and animal forms belong to FIXED SPECIES, of which each was individually created by God and has remained in its present form since Creation! 
King James Bible translation of the Hebrew word "min" is KIND, today can be translated more accurately as "species".

Now let us put on trial which one of the two is true science. Evolution or Creation?

The Chicago Darwinian Centennial in 1959 when Sir Julian Huxley addressed his speech to the congregation of 2,5OO delegates, he said, "Evolution has no room for the supernatural...We all accept the FACT of Evolution... Evolution of life is no longer a theory. It is a FACT...the basis of all our thinking."
Wait a minute, a FACT?  What was his basis when he said "Fact"? I think Sir Huxley (or Hoaxley) is using a different dictionary. To him the definition of Fact is unproven theory. 


I will challenge Evolutionist to produce Cats from Dogs or Dogs from Cats. A Dalmatian dog can inter-breed with German-shepherd but not with a Persian Cat. The simple truth is what the Bible declared thousands of years ago that God created everything "after its own kind" and there is no possibility to Get Out of that kind!  
"Why, if species have descended from the other species by fine gradation, do we NOT everywhere see innumerable TRANSITIONAL forms? Why is not all nature in CONFUSION, instead of the species being as we see them, well defined?"
Who asked the above question? Yes, Charles Darwin himself was confused by the evidences he found in nature. 
The answer to his question is simple! All he had to do was read Genesis chapter one, and he could have known that species have not descended from OTHER species, but were CREATED by GOD in orderly, set "kinds", and THAT'S why all nature is not in confusion!

But some people question: "Haven't the scientists working with genetics produced new species of hybrid plants and animals? Doesn't this prove that entirely new species could evolve from interbreeding between different parent species?" 
No. The accepted definition among the scientific community of a "species" is: "A group of organisms that freely interbreed and produce fertile offspring." 
The rare hybrids that can be produced are not "fertile offspring", but are STERILE! As the Collegiate encyclopedia acknowledges: "The infertility of species hybrids is one mechanism by which species can remain distinct."
God Himself has placed the barrier of sterility against the mixing up of His original appointed "kinds". A good example of this is the MULE, which is a species hybrid between a male ass and a female horse. Although outwardly appearing to be a new species, or "kind", it is impossible for a male and female mule to reproduce mule offspring. The only way is to continually cross a male ass with a female horse. That God-ordained biological principle was even verified by the Evolutionary professor of zoology, Richard B. Goldschmidt, who wrote, "Nowhere have the limits of the species been transgressed, and these limits are separated from the limits of the next good species by the unbridged gap, STERILITY."

No comments: