15-Year Study: Philippines Greatest Concentration of Unique Mammals

How We Got God's Word By David J. Stewart

How We Got God's Word

By David J. Stewart

Psalms 45:1, “My heart is inditing a good matter: I speak of the things which I have made touching the king: my tongue is the pen of a ready writer.”

       I gleaned the following thoughts from a timeless and needful sermon by Pastor Jack Hyles (1926-2001) titled,HOW WE GOT GOD'S WORD?
Dr. Hyles provides the following sermon outside:

1. The Words of God have always been in Heaven.
2. Man must have them to live.
3. God must find a way to get every Word up there down here to man.
4. God chose men and made them holy. He did not choose men who were holy; but rather, He chose men to make them holy. By that I mean He set them apart to be His pen.
5. God could not trust giving to sinful man the Words to give to us, so God gave those Words through these men, holy (chosen and sanctified) men. And through those men He gave His Words to us.

God Himself gave His Words, not to holy men of old; but rather, through holy men of old. God literally put His Words into their mouth. Those chosen men of old, which God set apart for His use, were simply PENS.

King David said...

Psalms 45:1, “My heart is inditing a good matter: I speak of the things which I have made touching the king: my tongue is the pen of a ready writer.”

Through the prophet Isaiah God said...

Isaiah 59:20-21, “And the Redeemer shall come to Zion, and unto them that turn from transgression in Jacob, saith the LORD. As for me, this is my covenant with them, saith the LORD; My spirit that is upon thee, and my words which I have put in thy mouth, shall not depart out of thy mouth, nor out of the mouth of thy seed, nor out of the mouth of thy seed's seed, saith the LORD, from henceforth and for ever.”

Beware of any false prophet who teaches that we have no perfect, inerrant, infallible, inspired, preserved English Bible. Bless God, we have that inspired Bible in the KING JAMES BIBLE. God used holy men (that is, men set apart for God's use) to give us the Words of God. God gave men His very Words, not His thoughts, to holy chosen men of old. God did not give His Words tothese men to give us; but rather through these men.

The Words God gave bypassed the brains of those sinful men. There's no man in this world righteous enough to be able to take the Words of God almighty and be the custodian of those Words and get those Words to us. Man did not decide what he wrote; but rather, the writers were pens, and God was the Penman. Moses was a murderer. David was an adulterer and murderer. Paul was a murderer. God did not trust those mortal creatures to give us God's Word. Are you going to trust a whoremongering man like Solomon who had 700 wives and 300 concubines to give us the Words of God? No way! God used Solomon's mouth, not his brain. David said he was not the penman; but rather, only the pen for the Lord.

Again we read...

Psalms 45:1, “My heart is inditing a good matter: I speak of the things which I have made touching the king: my tongue is the pen of a ready writer.”

They weren't holy in the sense of righteous living; but rather, they were “set apart” and chosen for God's purpose and work. Those inspired Words have been divinely preserved unto this day in the inspired King James Bible. The Bible is not men giving us the Words of God; but rather, it is God Himself giving us His Words using the mouths of the men who were chosen by God to do so.

Moses did not give us the Pentateuch (i.e., the first 5 books of the Old Testament). Moses was the mere pen. God is the Penman. It was God speaking through Moses. God cannot use the impure minds of a murderer like Moses, nor an adulterer like David to get His pure Words to us...

Psalms 12:6, “The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.”

“Pure” means that you cannot improve on them. God's Words are perfect and cannot be made better. God cannot use the impure minds of men to give us God's pure Words. So God chose men and made them holy (not in the sense of being righteous, but in the sense of being chosen). And God said, I'm going to use your mouth and your tongue. The men who wrote the Bible were mere PENS, but God is the divine PENMAN.

Most of the men who wrote the Bible didn't even know what they were writing when they wrote it. The Words of the Bible were not given to us by a man named Moses who killed an Egyptian, nor by an adulterer and murderer named David, nor by a Christ-denier named Peter; but rather, by the God Who penned them. God is the Penmen, and the men whom God chose to give us the Bible were mere pens.

God PROMISED in Psalm 12:6-8 to PRESERVE His Words unto every generation, because we need every Word of God to live as Deuteronomy 8:3 and Matthew 4:4 teach. We have those inspired and preserved Words in the precious King James Bible.

The following needful quote is from Pastor Jack Hyles...

“You recall the first appearance that Satan made on earth, as far as the Bible records, is the appearance in the Garden of Eden. When he came to man and accused God to man. He said, God's Word is not true, I know what God said, but it's not true. Satan has not stopped that kind of dastardly conduct. He still casts reflection on the Word of God. Any time you find a teacher or preacher who stands behind a pulpit or sits behind a desk, and says that this Bible is not verbally word-for-word inspired of God, you can rest assured where that came from. It came from the father of lies, even the one who began such behavior and such accusations in the Garden of Eden.”

SOURCE: Pastor Jack Hyles, from the excellent sermon WHEN SATAN IS AT HIS WORST.

Did you read that? ...

“Any time you find a teacher or preacher who stands behind a pulpit or sits behind a desk, and says that this Bible is not verbally word-for-word inspired of God, you can rest assured where that came from. It came from the father of lies...”

SOURCE: Pastor Jack Hyles, from the excellent sermon WHEN SATAN IS AT HIS WORST.

There is a malicious attack these days against the inspiration of the King James Bible. It is a critically important issue, because we must have every Word of God if we are to be able to live spiritually as Matthew 4:4 teaches. Don't let the Devil steal your confidence, faith, love, and trust in the inerrant, infallible, impeccable, and inspired Words of God divinely preserved in the precious King James Bible.

Facts You Should Know Between Macoy and Ninoy (video)

You've probably have watched these two videos before but today I have itch to remind you again...

Mysterious Circle on Seafloor Solved

Click to Read Article

WEALTHY LIARS, RICH TRAITORS, & MEDIA DARLINGS!

I've felt the need to reshare this video for this coming May 13th election....Good Luck to your life. 

Let's Go back To Sabah

(For today I'll be sharing a very enlightening article...)

Is ‘treason’ the real crime, or simple incompetence?

By Francisco S. Tatad 

An article I wrote on this page last week suggested cluelessness on Sabah, confusion on Jabidah, and impotence on China on the part of the Aquino government.

The article saw instant reprints in some Filipino papers in Canada and the United States, went viral online, and drew intense partisan reactions here and abroad.

Some found it “unthinkable” that one could write about President B. S. Aquino III’s inability to respond to pressing national concerns in words which no one of any official standing has dared to use. They thought it “an offense against the King,” which should never have been permitted and should therefore be censured.

They couldn’t show that false conclusions were drawn from false premises, so they tried instead to drown the writer in a torrent of verbal abuse. That is a risk all serious writers are forced to accept.

The stronger reaction, however, came from those who agreed that Aquino has done nothing to protect the national interest, but criticized the writer anyway for treating him with “kid gloves.”

“It isn’t quite true the Sabah madness is just because of official ignorance, ineptitude, and incompetence,” they said. “It is the result of a deliberate sellout to the Malaysian government, and nothing less than ‘treasonable conduct’ is involved,” they said.

They repeated an allegation made earlier by Hermes Dorado, a retired Filipino foreign service officer who used to handle territorial issues at the Department of Foreign Affairs, at a university forum, that the sellout was initiated not by B.S. Aquino III, but rather by his celebrated parents—the late former senator Benigno S. “Ninoy” Aquino Jr. and the late former president Corazon C. Aquino as early as 30 years ago.

Dorado claims that on Ninoy’s fateful journey from his three years of self-exile in the U.S., which ended in his assassination upon his arrival at the Manila International Airport on Aug. 21, 1983, he stopped by Singapore, then motored to Kuala Lumpur in order to speak to then-Prime Minister Mahathir bin Mohamad about Sabah. Ninoy reportedly sought Mahathir’s help in bringing down then-President Ferdinand Marcos from power in exchange for dropping the Philippine Sabah claim once Marcos was ousted.

This allegation is not supported by any documentary evidence. But Dorado says he was at the Philippine embassy in Bangkok at the time, in the company of then-Ambassador Rafael Ileto, the Philippine ambassador to Thailand, who had been tasked to monitor Ninoy’s movement as soon as he landed in Singapore. He says he got his information directly from Ileto.

No question about Ileto’s credibility or competence. Ileto was one of the most distinguished and honorable men to come from the military and the foreign service in maybe 50 years. Educated at West Point, he rose to become a major general and vice chief of staff of the Armed Forces of the Philippines. He founded the Scout Rangers, and was the only member of the high command who refused to endorse Marcos’s proclamation of martial law in 1972.

Impressed by his integrity and spunk but unable to name him chief of staff, Marcos named him ambassador to Iran and Turkey instead. That was in 1975. In 1980, he was posted to Thailand. He died in 2003 without revealing anything about his supposed monitoring of Ninoy’s alleged activities in Kuala Lumpur.

Outside of Dorado’s assertion, there is nothing to prove that Ileto made the statement attributed to him. Neither is there any independent confirmation of the alleged meeting between Ninoy and Mahathir, much less of the reported deal to bring down Marcos in exchange for the dropping of the Sabah claim. But Dorado’s allegation continues to play onYouTube, without a word from Malacañang.

It is no secret that for years, Malaysia provided training and logistical support to the Moro National Liberation Front. It has also been expecting the Philippines to drop its territorial claim, in keeping with Marcos’s statement that he would “take steps” to remove the Sabah claim as a source of continued misunderstanding between Manila and Kuala Lumpur.

I was present at the 1977 summit conference of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations hosted by Malaysia’s third prime minister, Tun Hussein Onn, in Kuala Lumpur when Marcos dropped that bombshell. Singapore Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew, who was the next speaker, was so taken aback that he said Marcos had just captured the world headlines, and there was nothing left for him to do but to tear up his prepared statement. Nevertheless, Marcos never followed through on his statement.

It is equally well known that Ninoy had close personal contacts in Malaysia, whose sentiments he apparently read well. While in detention during martial law, he offered to serve as Marcos’s special emissary to the MNLF and the Islamic countries supporting the MNLF rebellion. However, Marcos never seriously considered the offer.

Ninoy was also no stranger to the idea of foreign governments and operatives interfering in the internal affairs of other countries. In 1957, as a 25-year-old hotshot mayor of his hometown Concepcion, Tarlac, Ninoy undertook secret operations for the CIA during the so-called Permesta rebellion in Indonesia. The rebellion was supported by the CIA and had its center in Manado. It was led by a group of colonels, including one who had resigned his position as Indonesian military attaché in Washington, D.C. to become a general in the Permesta army.

A book written by the American couple Audrey Kahin and George Mc T Kahin, and quoting the late Senator Jose Wright Diokno as its source (Subversion as Foreign Policy: The Secret Eisenhower and Dulles Debacle in Indonesia), says Ninoy set up a clandestine radio station in Indonesia for the rebels, shipped them guns from a third country, and opened up his wife’s family’s sugar plantation, Hacienda Luisita, in Tarlac, as a training ground for the Indonesian rebel pilots.

The rebellion ended after the Indonesian air force destroyed most of the rebel B-26 planes on Manado, and one B-26 plane was shot down and its pilot captured by Sukarno’s forces. The pilot turned out to be an American CIA agent named Allen Pope. Upon interrogation, he exposed the CIA’s deep involvement in the rebellion, forcing the US to abandon its operations, and leaving Ninoy and other foreign agents holding the proverbial empty bag.

Given that early personal experience, Ninoy may have had no aversion in asking Mahathir to interfere in Philippine affairs just to help him bring down Marcos.

Whether or not Mahathir took the bait is not known, but given Malaysia’s desire to see the Philippine claim to Sabah dropped, it is not unreasonable to suspect he did. At that time the usual international actors already appeared inclined to support a regime change in the Philippines.

Ninoy’s untimely death rendered any agreement with Mahatir—assuming there was, in fact, one—unimplementable. But Dorado makes bold to claim that in 1986, the late Corazon Aquino, Ninoy’s widow, made good her husband’s end of the bargain after the EDSA uprising installed her as revolutionary president.

Proof of this, he says, is the deletion of a long phrase in the 1987 Constitution that made Sabah part of the “national territory” of the Philippines.

Under the 1973 Constitution, the national territory “comprises the Philippine archipelago, with all the islands and waters embraced therein, and all the other territories belonging to the Philippines by historic right or legal title, including the territorial sea, the air space, the subsoil, the sea-bed, the insular shelves, and the other submarine areas over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdiction. The waters around, between and connecting the islands of the archipelago, irrespective of their breadth and dimensions, form part of the internal waters of the Philippines.”

The phrase “all the other territories belonging to the Philippines by historic right or legal title” is deemed to include Sabah, the sovereign title to which had been ceded to the Philippine government in 1973 by the Sultan of Sulu, its original owner and sovereign. However, this phrase was deleted in the 1987 Constitution drafted by Cory’s appointive constitutional commission.

Under this Constitution, the national territory “comprises the Philippine archipelago, with all the islands and waters embraced therein, and all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdiction, consisting of its territorial, fluvial, and aerial domains, including its territorial sea, the seabed, the subsoil, the insular shelves, and other submarine areas.

The waters around, between, and connecting the islands of the archipelago, regardless of their breadth and dimensions, form part of the internal waters of the Philippines.”

The two texts are nearly identical, except for the deleted portion of Article I of the 1973 Constitution, which has been replaced in Article I of the 1987 Constitution with the words, “all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdiction.”

Critics of the “Cory Constitution” argue that the deletion of the phrase in the “Marcos Constitution” effectively removes Sabah as part of the national territory, while defenders of the same argue that the phrase “all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdiction” in fact affirms Philippine sovereignty and jurisdiction over the territory.

Malaysian legal analysts, however, favor the wording of the “Cory Constitution” as against that of the “Marcos Constitution.” To what extent was Cory Aquino involved in that rewording? This is not known.

Although the commission that drafted the Constitution was supposed to have been independent, it seems inconceivable that the commissioners could have embarked on such a major change without briefing the President or securing her consent.

But whether in fact she may have been completely innocent, the accusation of “treasonable conduct” is now leveled against her and her late husband and their bachelor president-son, rather than at her handpicked commissioners. The burden of clearing their names now lies with B.S. III. And so far he has responded with silence.

Outside of an impeachment process, where treason may be alleged as a ground for seeking the President’s removal, there is no legal forum in which the charge of “treasonable conduct” may be heard at this point. The Senate, which is tasked to look after the conduct of foreign policy, may not be non-partisan or competent enough to conduct the necessary inquiry.

Thus Dorado’s charge, propagated and enlarged by continued repetition, will remain in the public domain.

This is not the first time the Aquino name will be tainted with the charge of treason. Ninoy’s father and B.S. III’s grandfather, Benigno Aquino, Sr., alias Igno, was charged with treason for collaborating with the enemy during the Japanese occupation of the Philippines.

As Speaker of the National Assembly, and vice-president and director-general of the infamous Kalibapi (Kapisanan ng Paglilingkod sa Bagong Pilipinas— Association for Service to the New Philippines) in the Japanese-controlled government, Igno delivered speeches praising Japan, criticizing the US, and denouncing Filipinos who refused to collaborate with the Japanese.

After the war, Igno was arrested and jailed by the U.S. military in Japan, then extradited to the Philippines to stand trial before the People’s Court for treason. But he died of a heart attack before his trial could begin.

This part of Philippine history is unremembered by the generation that survived the last war, and unknown to, and unread by the young who have been mesmerized by the political myths and fables spun by the oversize English-language tabloids and celebrity-oriented television.

But the questions being raised about the Aquinos’ (father, mother and son) real position on Sabah could finally shatter the veil of generational indifference that has long covered the naked truths of our history from the young, and finally expose to the light of day the quislings, charlatans, opportunists, and frauds who have been posturing as patriots, heroes and champions of our people.

The First Jesuit Pope

"The Jesuits are a MILITARY organization, not a religious order. Their chief is a general of an army, not the mere father abbot of a monastery. And the aim of this organization is power – power in its most despotic exercise – absolute power, universal power, power to control the world by the volition of a single man. Jesuitism is the most absolute of despotisms – and at the same time the greatest and most enormous of abuses." -- Napoleon Bonaparte

  

To those who really knew The Jesuit Order the sum of all their fears had just arrive last March 13, 2013. Why is that? Because The Catholic Cult had elected for the first time a Jesuit Priest as Pope. Pope Francis I a.k.a. Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio age 76 (7 plus 6 is 13) ooops they think it was just a coincidence that we had too much 13 during the conclave.  Anyway, to continue.... The Jesuits have a legendary tradition for…torture!!! Ever heard of the Spanish Inquisition?

    Any Catholic Priest knew that The Jesuits are different. Different in many aspect especially in their finances. They operate behind the scene and very secretive. They go to school much longer. Voltaire went to a Jesuit school and said he learn Latin and non-sense. 
   Any honest student of church history must admit that behind the scenes, they have been the governing genius of the Vatican -- even though, more often than not, an evil genius.

"The Jesuits are a MILITARY organization, not a religious order. Their chief is a general of an army, not the mere father abbot of a monastery. And the aim of this organization is power – power in its most despotic exercise – absolute power, universal power, power to control the world by the volition of a single man. Jesuitism is the most absolute of despotisms – and at the same time the greatest and most enormous of abuses." -- Napoleon Bonaparte

    Let us learn a little history here folks about The Jesuit Order or The Society of Jesus. Oh the Blasphemy to use the name of Our Lord in evil activities:   

    Founded in 1534 by a Spanish Soldier by the name of Ignatius Loyola. Loyola was born don Inigo Lopez de Racalde, in the castle of Loyola in the province of Guipuzcoa in 1491. He was known as a youth to be treacherous, brutal and vindictive. He was referred to as an unruly and conceited soldier. Loyola was wounded at the siege of Pampeluna in 1521. Crippled by a broken leg and plagued by a limp the rest of his life, he sought “spiritual” conquests.

   Their basic function was to fortify the position of the Pope and more importantly to convert Heretics or infidels by all means (this was usually done by force and not thru evangelization) especially Moors and Jews.   

   The Jesuits were often assign to do the "dirty works" for the Vatican. They were founded to be a secret society, a society that was to slide in behind the scenes and capture the positions of leadership. The Jesuits knew that to capture the leaders of any particular country or organization is to conquer the entire body.

   By 1749 members of the order had grown more than 22,000. One of the famous Jesuit is no other than Hitler. 

The Jesuits and Hitler

   Hitler himself stated, “I learned much from the Order of the Jesuits. Until now, there has never been anything more grandiose, on the earth, than the hierarchical organization of the Catholic church. I transferred much of this organization into my own party.”

   Walter Schellenberg, former chief of Nazi counter-espionage made this statement: “The S.S. organization had been constituted by Himmler according to the principles of the Jesuit Order. Their regulations and the Spiritual Exercises prescribed by Ignatius of Loyola were the model Himmler tried to copy exactly. Himmler’s title as supreme chief of the S.S. was to be the equivalent of the Jesuits’ ‘General’ and the whole structure was a close imitation of the Catholic Church’s hierarchical order.”

   “The public is practically unaware of the overwhelming responsibility carried by the Vatican and its Jesuits in the start of the two world wars — a situation which may be explained in part by the gigantic finances at the disposition of the Vatican and its Jesuits, giving them power in so many spheres, especially since the last conflict.” source 

   Some famous personality can attest to their cruelty, treacherousness, and trickery: 

"My history of the Jesuits is not eloquently written, but it is supported by unquestionable authorities, [and] is very particular and very horrible. Their [the Jesuit Order’s] restoration [in 1814 by Pope Pius VII] is indeed a step toward darkness, cruelty, despotism, [and] death. … I do not like the appearance of the Jesuits. If ever there was a body of men who merited eternal damnation on earth and in hell, it is this Society of [Ignatius de] Loyola." -- John Adams (1735-1826; 2nd President of the United States)

"The Jesuits…are a secret society – a sort of Masonic order – with superadded features of revolting odiousness, and a thousand times more dangerous." -- Samuel Morse (1791-1872; American inventor of the telegraph; author of the book Foreign Conspiracy Against the Liberties of the United States)

"I have learnt most of all from the Jesuit Order. So far, there has been nothing more imposing on earth than the hierarchical organization of the Catholic Church. A good part of that organization I have transported direct to my own party. The Catholic Church must be held up as an example. I will tell you a secret. I am founding an order. In Himmler (who would become head of the Nazi party) I see our Ignatius de Loyola (Jesuit founder)." -- Adolph Hitler

“Alas, I knew they [i.e., the Jesuits] would poison me; but I did not expect to die in so slow and cruel a manner.” (1774) -- Pope Clement XIV (Who had “forever” abolished the Jesuit Order in 1773) 

(by the way, They are known expert assassin in a method called Poison Cup )

"The war [i.e., the American Civil War of 1861-1865] would never have been possible without the sinister influence of the Jesuits." -- Abraham Lincoln (1809-1865; 16th President of the United States)

“It is impossible to read Elizabethan history [i.e., the history surrounding Queen Elizabeth I of England; queen: 1558-1603] except in the context of an army of Jesuits, masters of deceit, treachery, treason, infiltration, subversion, assassination, insurrection, civil war and coercion, plotting for the good of the papacy, and the defeat of all the Pope’s foes anywhere in the world.” (1987) -- J.E.C. Shepherd (Canadian historian)

   If you are still unconvinced you can read more about the Jesuit Order according to famous men and women on this link:  (Click Here)

   Or better yet, Let these pictures say a thousand word...

   

Well, the Jesuit Order may have that Bad Reputation but maybe not the New Pope. Let's wait and see. 

The first concern of Pope Francis I, was to address the controversy about Pedophilia, Prostitution inside Vatican, Money Laundering, Genocides, among others...

Benedict can't handle these so he gave up, maybe this time a tactical Jesuit Pope can answer the issue...I hope so....

Sources:
http://www.thecontroversialfiles.net/2013/03/jesuits-order-power-political-nature.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/mar/13/papal-conclave-chooses-pope-day-two-live-coverage
http://open.salon.com/blog/lastdaysdeceptionnews/2010/07/07/quotes_on_the_jesuit_order

    I suggest  you visit the page Secret Instructions of the Society of Jesus...

Origin of the Papal Office

Nimrod, the political and religious leader of the Nation Babylon. This religion merge the office of a king and a priest. For the first time in human history a Priest-King office was held by one man. Binding the separation of church and state. 

   This Pagan religion started that idea of building a tower that would reach heaven. The popular story of Babel where God compounded the languages of men.

   Most people think that the Priest-King office ended there but the Babylonian Mystery religion survived.  

   Many are familiar with the feast Belshazzar held in Babylon when the mysterious handwriting appeared on the wall. Some have failed to recognize  however, that this gathering was more than a mere social party! It was a religious gathering, a celebration of the Babylonian mysteries of which Belshazzar was the head at that time. ‘They drank wine, and praised the gods of gold, and of silver, and of brass, of iron, of wood, and of stone” (Dan. 5:4). Adding to the blasphemy of the occasion, they drank their wine from the holy vessels of the Lord which had been taken from the Jerusalem temple. This attempt to mix that which was holy with that which was heathenism, brought about Divine Judgement. Babylon was marked for doom. (Source)

   This Priest-King office was also adopted by Rome, when it conquered the world they mixed Babylonian Religion with their Pagan Sun-Worship. Another title given to Caesars (or Kings) is Pontifex Maximus. The Supreme Pontiff, The Chief Priest,  and today simplified as Pope. 

 The title Pontifex Maximus is repeatedly found on inscriptions throughout the Vatican--above the entry of St. Peter's, above the statue of Peter, in the dome, over the Holy Year Door which is opened only during a jubilee year, etc.  The accompanying medal, struck by Pope Leo X just before the Reformation, illustrates one of the ways that the title "Pont. Max,"   has been used by the popes...

  It was not until 431, however, that the pope publicly made the claim that the keys he possessed were the keys of authority given to the apostle Peter.  This was over fifty years after the pope had become the Pontifex Maximus, the possessor of the keys.  Keys are shown as symbols of the papal authority. 

   We know that Catholicism is known to mixed together Paganism and Christianity. They look for ways to merge Sun Worship and Christianity. It's not easy to declare that the Pope is also Pontifex Maximus but they found a clever manipulation. They found there man, Peter. To Jesus he gave to Simon  the nickname Peter for his rock solid faith but to the Vatican it is an opportunity to infused the Chaldean title Peter or interpreter (or the interpreter of the mysteries). 

The Problem with Peter

   To Christianize the sun worship, the bishop of Rome associated the Grand Interpreter of Rome to Peter the apostle. But there is a big problem here to Third Century Christian in Rome. Peter was unknown or unpopular to third or forth century Gentile Christians. We must remember that Christianity spread to the gentile world via St. Paul. Peter never even set foot on Rome. To merge the Peter (The Interpreter) to Peter (The apostle) they have to invent a story that Simon Peter died on Rome. So you heard the story that Peter died on an inverted cross in Rome but that was unfounded, no basis, and the Bible had no record too. No first century Historian told us that...but a latter Roman Historian told us otherwise who is this Peter or to be exact Simon. 

    This Simon, known to Bible students as Simon the sorcerer (Acts 8:9), is said to have later gone to Rome and founded a counterfeit Christian religion there! Because this sounds so bizarre, in order to make it clear there is no bias on our part, we quote the following right from The Catholic Encyclopedia about this Simon:

   "Justin Martyr and other early writers inform us that he afterwards went to Rome, worked miracles there by the power of demons, and received Divine honors both in Rome and in his own country. Though much extravagant legend afterwards gathered around the name of this Simon, it seems nevertheless probable that there must be some foundation in fact for the account given by Justin and accepted by Eusebius. The historical Simon Magus no doubt founded some sort of religion as a counterfeit of Christianity in which he claimed to play a part analogous to that of Christ." (Source)

   Perhaps this "Simon" being in Rome was later confused with Simon Peter.  The popes have claimed to be 'Christ in office' on earth.  Apparently Simon the sorcerer made the same claim in Rome.  But we never read of any such claim being made by Simon Peter the apostle!

  The cock crowing during Peter's denial was associated to the cock that was on Janus (the two-face god) foot. It was an easy task isn't it? To Janus worshiper the cock was regarded as a sacred animal.(read John 18:27)

   To Real Bible reading Christians we know that the key was not given alone to Peter but to all the other apostles. 

    It is certain that the title "supreme Pontiff" or "Pontifex Maximus" which the pope bears is not a Christian designation, for it was the title used by Roman emperors before the Christian Era.  The word "pontiff comes from the word pons, "bridge," and facio. "make."  It means "bridge-maker,"  The priest-king emperors of sun worship days were regarded as the makers and guardians of the bridges of Rome.  Each of them served as high priest and claimed to be the bridge or connecting link between this life and the next.

Mithraic Branch of Babylon

   That branch of the mysteries known as Mithraism grew in Rome until it became-at one time-almost the only faith of the empire.  The head priest was called the Pater Patrum, that is, the Father of Fathers.  Borrowing directly from this title, at the head of the Roman Catholic church, is the Papa or Pope-the Father of Fathers. The "Father" of Mithraism had his seat at Rome then, and the "Father" of Catholicism has his there now.

   But in when it comes to Religion we are told by Jesus Christ himself in Matthew 23:9...

And do not call anyone on earth 'father,' for you have one Father, and he is in heaven. (Matthew 23:9)

   See that open-mouth fish on the head of your pope or bishops?

   The tiara crown that the popes wear-though decorated in different ways at different times-is identical in shape to that worn by the "gods" or angels that are shown on ancient sun worship Assyrian tablets.  It is similar to that seen on Dagon, the fish--god pictured here, Dagon was actually but a mystery form of the false Babylonian "savior."  The name Dagon comes from dag(a word commonly translated "fish" in the Bible) and means fish-god.  Though it originated in the sun worship of Babylon, Dagon worship became especially popular among the Philistines (Judges 16:21-30; 1 Sam. 5:5,6).

    The way Dagon was depicted on Mesopotamian sculpture is seen in the drawing reproduced below (second figure from left).  In his book Babylon and Nineveh, Layard explains that "the head of the fish formed a mitre above that of the man, while its scaly, fan-like tail fell as a cloak behind, leaving the human limbs and feet exposed."

   Babylonian Mystery religion continues up to this date hidden as Christianity,  to be exact false Religion of the Roman Catholic Church, even the name itself does not claim to be follower of Jesus but of Rome. 

   If you are RCC member,better beware. Please if you really love Jesus Christ consider what I have written here. 
(While I was writing this I've heard that pope Benedict XVI is resigning from office...Hmmmm? What Political stunt is this again? Better check....)

Various Deceivers and Their Connections

2 Timothy 4:3-4
New International Version (NIV)
³ For the time will come when people will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear. ⁴ They will turn their ears away from the truth and turn aside to myths.

  The Illuminati "Skull and Bones" Emblem on the cross

  Let us begin with a common ground here. I suppose we all agree in believing there is a God. The Father, who created the heavens and the earth. 

   Mormons or LDS, Catholics, Protestants, Jehovah's Witnesses, Evangelicals, Pentecostal, Baptist, etc...I would assume, after having attended all these churches mentioned above that we all agree that there is a God. He is what we dearly called The Father. (Well, other religion like to call Him on personal name but for me that is disrespect...would you call your father by His name?)

   I have seen how faithful and sincere you are in observing the "will" of God. But allow me, to re-focus on the word "will". How do we know we are keeping up to His standards? 

...your kingdom come, your will be done on earth as it is in heaven.-- Matthew 6:10

Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven...

   After years and years of truly seeking God, by attending nearly all kinds of Christian churches, I've seen that the problem usually lies on the observation of His true will. 

   There should be means to know these will or else God would be unfair. How do we know God's true will or purposes for our life? 

   Obviously the "will" of God should be found in His own words. At our present generation many had claim to have received revelations from God or through them as a medium God speaks. There are also others who interpret the Bible, beware the Bible can not be interpreted by men but by the Bible itself. The Bible speaks for itself. Do not be sway by those claiming they can interpret the Bible. 

   Unlike those who blatantly declare their disrespect in our Creator, a false prophet will not tell you what they really are. An atheist or a Satanist will tell you their purpose but a False Prophet will never do that, if they do, then you would know. They are deceivers, and sadly most of their members don't know they are being deceived, thus defending their faith.  

  World renowned Satanist, Aleister Crowley, wearing the all-seeing eye cap (notice the pyramid!) and the five pointed star on the book.

Paul spoke of this often in his writings, "...but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ" (Galatians 1:7). 

   

   Thankfully, the Word of God (the Bible) is open to all. There is no private interpretations of the Bible, "Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation" (2nd Peter 1:20).

   What does it mean? That the Bible can not be interpreted by anyone. Let the Bible speaks for itself. Anything extra is what we now call "occult" teachings. 

   Vatican speaks of Limbo and little children as angels, Mormons speaks of Baptism of the dead, Jehovah's Witness boast of knowing the real name of God, and some Protestant Churches claims new prophesies...those are just few of the doctrines that are not supported in the Holy scriptures. And those are just few of the churches that are not from God... 

   The above mentioned "occult" churches had many other rituals and practices that are demonic in their origins which I had mentioned before...like Mormons special hate for black people before they were pressured by activist. Now they changed that concept but did they really change as a whole? 

   The same goes to Catholic faith, recently they removed the teaching about Limbo or purgatory but does it mean that they are now teaching the truth? Obviously not. We can still see so many Satanic symbols inside their church. 

   For this blog let me focus on a church that is so outrageous in blatant display of satanism, I sometimes wonder how their members failed to notice them...

   In his Satanic Bible, Anton LaVey listed under "In Infernal Names" , one of them as "Mormo" which is the god of the living dead and the king of the Ghouls. 

   Now let's think about this, followers of Christ is called Christians and so follower of Mormo (god of the living dead) is therefor called? Mormons?

MORMONS or The Latter Day Saints  

   Is it just coincidence that LDS members are very comfortable with the dead?  They claimed to be visited regularly by dead family members. They also believe that through prayers these dead people can also receive salvation. Seen similarity with Catholics on this belief? Told you, they are one and the same...this is perhaps how One World Religion will be push through because basically, all these Demon churches are one...just like Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, etc... 

   Anyway, back to Mormonism...did you know that missionaries had a hard time witnessing in China, not because of communist rule but because the word Mormon in Chinese means "gates of hell".

   Now let me give you a little History on the Mormon Church. In 1821 a young treasure seeker named Joseph Smith claimed to have had a vision from God. First he said it was from Jesus, then he said from Jesus and many angels, and then he said that it was from Jesus and God the Father. This is what they go by today. Mormons claim that Joseph Smith was visited by Jesus and God the father; but the Bible tells us that no man can look upon the face of God and live. He was also visited by a so-called angel named Moroni, who supposedly told him about a secret manuscript, written on golden plates, telling the true Gospel. 

   And that he was to translate this into the Book of Mormon. Let me truly begin here and tell you what they believe. They believe that long ago from an unknown god ,and goddess, was born a man named Elohim who was later born to human parents, and he lived his life and became a god like his father. He is also claimed to have fathered many children. Two of them in particular are named: one is Jesus, and the other is Lucifer. 

   They decided to put all of Elohim’s many children on a planet, and that the planet needed a savior the bid, for it came down to Jesus and to Lucifer. But Jesus won out because he had unselfish reasons. But then Lucifer revolted and turned many of Elohim’s children against him, and they were banished to the earth, never to have physical bodies. The people who were on the side of Jesus were very light skinned. And the people who remained neutral in the battle, their skinned turned black and this is the Mormon explanation for the black race. Mormons believe after that battle, the people were sent to Earth, and Elohim came to earth, and had sex with Mary, and that is how Jesus came to Earth. 

   They also believe that Jesus took three wives while on Earth: Mary, Martha, and Mary Magdalene. They also believe that Jesus fathered many Children during his time on Earth, and that Joseph Smith their founder was a direct descendant of Jesus. They believe that after a life of Mormonism and a Mormon marriage has taken place, that when they die they will become gods too. They also believe that they will have their own planet, and many goddess wives, and their job for eternity will be to populate the planets. I know how far fetched this all sounds, but these people actually believe this mess. 

   Mormonism is a sex cult. And we never would have guessed any of this from those sweet family-oriented Mormon commercials on TV. People please be aware of these dangerous occult.  These people are lost and on there way to Hell. They desperately need Jesus.

The Divine Mercy

   Why do the Catholics want us to memorize this face? What is their plot? Obviously, this is not just another Catholic image, or icon. This one is special, and it is shown all over the world. Last year I read a lot of Catholic articles in Spanish, Russian, French, even Polish, and I would see Faustina's Jesus almost all the time. Pope John Paul II loved this painting, and Faustina's dream finally came true: this painting is now shown all over the world. 

   The IMAGE OF DIVINE MERCY is not just another cheap Catholic image, this one is truly special, this is an image of someone who will deceive a lot of people in the future. Maybe it's of the future Antichrist, or maybe of someone else, but we know that this painting was done to deceive in a big way.
   Basically, the picture above and the picture below had one and same symbolism. The obvious of course is the prominence of a Pyramid view and both image shows internal organ that symbolizes desire (Reproductive organ and the heart)...
    But what is of prime importance are Both picture are telling us the doctrine: "as above, so below"...that is basic Satanic deception--the concept of duality. The Chinese call it "yin-yang" or both female/male energy. The so-called Star of David logo on Israel flag also is the basis of this concept and many other ambigram like that of the Nazis.

   It's not about ...your kingdom come, your will be done on earth as it is in heaven.-- Matthew 6:10
   See the female breast on Satanism but in a very masculine body? That is also what you can see in Faustina's long hair Christ. (see the Long Hair of Jesus)
   They claim that God are both male and female. Absurd! Nowhere in the Holy Bible where you can find that dual quality on God the Father. In fact, Queen of Heaven worship was detestable in the sight of God and we can read a lot of that incidence.

Jer 7:1818 The children gather wood, and the fathers kindle the fire, and the women knead their dough, to make cakes to the queen of heaven, and to pour out drink offerings unto other gods, that they may provoke me to anger. (KJV)

   All of these promotes Mother of Heaven worship. Whenever I speak of Satanism, it is unavoidable to interlock them all together. They all boils from one pot. It's a smorgasbord of evil menu that caters to deceive.  

   See the unified symbolism of duality on pictures below? Remember also the Hippies? "Peace" in unity of all gods.  Careful though, it was a false flag. It was made to unite false gods against the One True God. 

Exodus 20:1-6 
1 And God spake all these words, saying,

2 I am the LORD thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.
3 Thou shalt have no other gods before me.

4 Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth:
5 Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;
6 And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments. (KJV)

   Does your religion worship The Queen of Heaven? We will tackle this on future blog. Plus other related False Gospels spread by various Religions.